The Curious Case of Casus Omissus and section 44AD of the Income Tax Act
Cite this
Citations are auto-generated; verify before publishing. The analysis classification is PolicyDhara's, not the source's.
Research or analytical publication — an evidence-based assessment informing policy design and evaluation. Shapes the intellectual framework within which policy debates occur.
Summary
**Hrishikesh Nani Palkhivala, regarded as one of the most prominent lawyers India has produced famously said that the Income Tax Act (IT Act hereinafter) was a national disgrace due its highly unstable nature caused by the plethora of amendments made each year. This act has suffered over 4000 amendments till the introduction of the new […] The post The Curious Case of Casus Omissus and section 44AD of the Income Tax Act appeared first on Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy.