Police officer who fails to furnish written grounds of arrest must face departmental inquiry: Supreme Court
Share
Cite this▾
Citations are auto-generated; verify before publishing. The news classification is PolicyDhara's, not the source's.
News coverage — journalism about policy, not a policy document. Useful as timely context; the underlying instrument is linked where known.
Summary
Police officer who fails to furnish written grounds of arrest must face departmental inquiry: Supreme Court
Key Facts
TypeNews
SourcePolicyRadar India
PublishedTuesday, 22 September 2026
Affected Population1.4 billion citizens, 20 million government employees
Key Numbers
20 million central + state government employees
Rs 3.3 lakh crore transferred via DBT
1,500+ services on UMANG app
UAPA cases: 5,000+ pending
Key Authorities
PMOCabinet SecretariatDARPGNITI AayogMinistry of Home Affairs
Key Stakeholders
Civil ServantsState GovernmentsJudiciaryCitizensHuman Rights DefendersMedia & Press
Government Context
NDA IIIBJP-led NDA
Centre-Right
LeftCentreRight
Amendment History
1 change recorded for this policy.
DescriptionTuesday, 22 September 2026via barandbench
Police officer who fails to furnish written grounds of arrest must face departmental inquiry: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has held that when police seek to re-arrest an accused released due to their failure to furnish written grounds of arrest, the investigation must be transferred to another officer and a departmental inquiry initiated against the officers responsible for failing to furnish the grounds of arrest [Jaskaran Jeet Singh Deol v. State of Punjab].A Bench of Justices Ujjal Bhuyan and Atul S Chandurkar reiterated that a failure to furnish written grounds of arrest violates Article 22(1)
**Riyan Paul Mathew “The degree of civilization in a society can be judged by entering its prisons”, Dostoevsky reminds us that a society must be judged by how it treats its most vulnerable, but what do you make of a society which throws people in prison for long durations before they have even been convicted? […] The post The Invisibilisation of the Undertrial appeared first on Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy.
A bench comprising Justices Sanjay Karol and Ujjal Bhuyan said the age of the deceased person had to be determined from the date of birth mentioned in the school leaving certificate.