Kerala High Court stays 'dry day' order at Kerala–TN border ahead of Tamil Nadu polls
Share
Official government notification — a formal executive order that operationalises policy decisions. Carries legal weight and specifies rules, dates, exemptions, or procedural requirements.
Summary
The Kerala High Court on Tuesday stayed a State government order imposing 'dry days' in areas within 5 kilometres of the Kerala-Tamil Nadu border ahead of the Tamil Nadu Assembly elections scheduled for April 23, 2026 [James v State of Kerala & ors].A Vacation Bench of Justice S Manu observed that the State's order was issued without any authority of law and could not be justified.The Court noted that Section 135C of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (prohibition of liquor sale duri
Key Facts
TypeNotification
SourceBar and Bench
PublishedTuesday, 21 April 2026
Affected Population~350 million BPL population, 140 million elderly
Key Numbers
PM-JAY: 55 crore beneficiaries
MGNREGA: Rs 86,000 crore annual outlay
NSAP pensions: 3 crore beneficiaries
Rs 15,000 crore for Digital India initiatives
Key Authorities
Ministry of Social Justice & EmpowermentNITI AayogMinistry of Electronics & ITTRAICERT-In
Key Stakeholders
BPL FamiliesSenior CitizensPersons with DisabilitiesInternet UsersTech CompaniesStartups
Government Context
NDA IIIBJP-led NDA
Centre-Right
LeftCentreRight
Amendment History
1 change recorded for this policy.
DescriptionWednesday, 22 April 2026via the_hindu_policy
The Kerala High Court on Tuesday stayed a State government order imposing 'dry days' in areas within 5 kilometres of the Kerala-Tamil Nadu border ahead of the Tamil Nadu Assembly elections scheduled for April 23, 2026 [James v State of Kerala & ors].A Vacation Bench of Justice S Manu observed that the State's order was issued without any authority of law and could not be justified.The Court noted that Section 135C of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (prohibition of liquor sale duri
Court stays Kerala government order on the grounds that the State did not have the power to issue such a direction, a lawyer associated with the case said
The European Union sought to ease tensions with Turkey after European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen named the country alongside Russia and China, creating the impression that the NATO partner was seen as a potential threat.